🪙 Token Comparison: REGCFToken vs. BFTKN

This page provides a side-by-side overview of the two primary tokens issued by R. Block Share Holdings, LLC as part of our dual-raise strategy. These tokens serve different purposes and are issued under different regulatory exemptions.

📊 Side-by-Side Token Comparison

Feature / Attribute	REGCFToken 🧾 (Equity)	BFTKN 💸 (Revenue-Share)
Token Purpose	Equity ownership via Class B Membership Units	Revenue-sharing without ownership
Issued Under	Regulation CF (via funding portal)	Regulation A+ (post-traction)
Investor Rights	Ownership interest, no governance rights	Revenue rights only, no equity or voting
Transferability	Locked for 12 months (per Reg CF)	Tradable post-qualification (ATS-compatible)
KYC/AML Required	Yes (North Capital allowlist)	Yes (North Capital allowlist)
Cap Table Inclusion	Yes (via KoreConX)	No
Minting Conditions	After escrow clears & KYC verified	After Reg CF validation and Form 1-A approval
Expected Launch	Immediately post-funding portal raise	Contingent on CF traction and SEC qualification
Token Pricing	Fixed price (equity per investment)	Dynamic pricing via bonding curve
Wallet Compatibility	Ethereum-based (e.g., MetaMask)	Ethereum-based (e.g., MetaMask)
Tax Treatment	May be taxed as equity stake (consult tax advisor)	May be taxed as income/distribution (consult tax advisor)
Ideal Investor	Long-term stakeholder in company equity	Traction-based participant in platform earnings

🧩 Strategic Use

These tokens work together in a phased capital formation plan:

REGCFToken supports early equity investment and anchors community ownership.
BFTKN unlocks additional participation post-traction and does not dilute existing ownership.

📘 Final Note

Investors may choose to hold either or both tokens depending on their risk profile and long-term goals. Ownership of one does not entitle access to the other. Each token has distinct rights and obligations based on applicable securities regulations.